The clerk advised a pro se defendant on possible consequences if he failed to adequately respond to motion for summary judgment. The defendant filed a "Petition for Abatement" in which he asserted that the complaint fails to name him as a party on the grounds that his name appears in all upper case letter.
The court's response: "This filing by defendant does not respond in any form to the arguments raised in the Government's motion for summary judgment, and the respondent has failed to otherwise respond to the motion."
United States v. Renfrow, 2009-2 USTC para. 50,580 (E.D.N.C. 2009).
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Hey
I have not been here for a while, right. Actually as always.
Update is such: three weeks of school left, got part-time job (legal research) but hope that I will be able to find something in tax controversy. Love tax, and this is the fact.
Summer is passing quickly and I do not feel it is the summer except for the weekends when I sweat at home (from both weather and intensity of studying).
I put sport kind of behind because of time and possibly laziness. Still do some runs for 30-35 minutes but regretfully no swimming.
That's it.
Update is such: three weeks of school left, got part-time job (legal research) but hope that I will be able to find something in tax controversy. Love tax, and this is the fact.
Summer is passing quickly and I do not feel it is the summer except for the weekends when I sweat at home (from both weather and intensity of studying).
I put sport kind of behind because of time and possibly laziness. Still do some runs for 30-35 minutes but regretfully no swimming.
That's it.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
